Loading promise…
Loading promise…
Promise · Trade
Donald Trump said, as a candidate
“We're going to have 10 to 20 percent tariffs on foreign countries that have been ripping us off for years. We're going to charge them 10 to 20 percent to come in and take advantage of our country because that's what they've been doing for nothing, to take our jobs.”
Rated Jul 24, 2026
Rated by AI-assisted research
Next review Jan 2027
Trump promised "10 to 20 percent tariffs on foreign countries," and the 2024 Republican platform called for "baseline Tariffs on Foreign-made goods." This record treats that as a promise of a broad baseline tariff on imports. As President he imposed a 10% baseline duty under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA) through Executive Order 14257, effective April 5, 2025. The order applied to most trading partners but excluded Canada and Mexico, which were covered by separate orders, as well as goods under Section 232 tariffs and listed products such as pharmaceuticals, semiconductors and energy. On February 20, 2026 the Supreme Court ruled 6-3 in Learning Resources, Inc. v. Trump that IEEPA does not allow the President to impose tariffs. Executive Order 14389 ended those duties the same day. Trump replaced them with a 10% surcharge under Section 122 of the Trade Act of 1974, which ran from February 24 to July 24, 2026. Since July 24, 2026, Section 301 tariffs have applied to goods from 60 economies that account for 99.4% of U.S. import value. That figure counts all imports from those economies before exemptions. The headline rates are 10% or 12.5%. For the EU, Taiwan, Japan, South Korea and Switzerland, though, the Section 301 duty is net of the existing most-favored-nation (MFN) rate, so on some goods it is lower or zero. The tariff does not apply to Canadian and Mexican goods entered duty-free under USMCA, goods under Section 232 tariffs, or listed product groups. The Tax Foundation estimates the tariff base at about $954 billion a year for 2026, before behavioral changes. As a rough cross-year comparison, that is about 28% of the $3.4 trillion in U.S. goods imports in 2025 reported by BEA.
The rating is compromise, not kept. Trump delivered a narrower version of the promise and supports it. The headline rates of 10% and 12.5% fall within the range he named, though for five partners the duty is net of MFN and can be lower. The action covers 60 economies accounting for 99.4% of U.S. import value before exemptions. After exemptions, though, it applies to well under half of U.S. imports by value, so it is not a baseline on imports generally. Even read against the narrower wording of the quote, "tariffs on foreign countries," the exemptions are large: most imports from Canada and Mexico enter duty-free under USMCA, and those goods are exempt. The difference matters to the outcome, which kept does not allow. The rating is not in progress or blocked, because the tariff is in force and being collected. A Court of International Trade ruling against it would call for a new review.
“Compromise” means: part of the promise happened, part did not.
How editors decide a ratingWhat “Compromise” meansReport an error in this rating
Votes, bills, laws and statements related to this promise, newest first.
Showing 4 of 4 items
Executive action
At the President's direction, USTR imposed tariffs on goods from 60 economies that account for 99.4% of U.S. import value before exemptions, effective July 24, 2026. The headline rates are 10% or 12.5%, but for the EU, Taiwan, Japan, South Korea and Switzerland the duty is net of the existing MFN rate, so it can be lower or zero. Many goods are exempt, including Canadian and Mexican goods entered duty-free under USMCA (most imports from the two countries, per the Dallas Fed), goods under Section 232 tariffs, and listed products. The Tax Foundation estimates the tariff base at about $954 billion a year for 2026, before behavioral changes.
Executive action
Proclamation 11012 put a 10% duty on imported goods, with listed exemptions, from February 24 to July 24, 2026, the 150-day limit of Section 122. On May 7, 2026 the Court of International Trade held it unlawful and granted relief to three plaintiffs only. On June 11, 2026 the Federal Circuit stayed that ruling pending appeal, so the surcharge was collected until it expired.
Executive action
In Learning Resources, Inc. v. Trump, decided together with Trump v. V.O.S. Selections, the Supreme Court ruled 6-3 that IEEPA does not authorize the President to impose tariffs, which ended the legal basis for the 10% baseline. The same day, Executive Order 14389 stopped the IEEPA duties, including those under Executive Order 14257.
Executive action
Executive Order 14257 imposed an additional duty starting at 10 percent on April 5, 2025, on imports from trading partners generally, with higher rates for dozens of countries. Canada and Mexico were handled under separate orders, and goods under Section 232 tariffs and listed products such as pharmaceuticals, semiconductors and energy were excluded.
Send us a source we missed or a fact we got wrong. Every correction is published in the corrections log.
Report an error