Loading promise…
Promise · Health care
Have government or insurers pay all IVF costs
_(3x4).jpg%2F500px-Official_Presidential_Portrait_of_President_Donald_J._Trump_(2025)_(3x4).jpg&w=3840&q=75)
Donald Trump said, as a candidate
“I'm announcing today in a major statement that under the Trump administration, your government will pay for, or your insurance company will be mandated to pay for all costs associated with IVF treatment, fertilization for women, IVF treatment.”
Current rating: Compromise
Compromise
Rated Feb 5, 2026
Rated by AI-assisted research
Next review Aug 2026
Why we rated it this way
Trump promised that the federal government would pay, or insurers would be required to pay, all costs of IVF treatment. As of October 2026 neither has happened. No new nationwide federal program pays all IVF costs, and no nationwide federal law or rule requires insurers to cover all IVF costs. Some benefits that predate the promise remain, such as limited IVF coverage through the VA, some federal employee (FEHB) plans and some state insurance mandates. In August 2025 White House officials told The Washington Post they had no current plans for a coverage mandate, saying they lacked the legal authority without Congress. What the administration did instead was narrower. Executive Order 14216 (February 2025) ordered policy recommendations on lowering IVF costs. In October 2025 it announced a drug-pricing deal with EMD Serono, and the Labor, HHS and Treasury departments issued FAQs explaining how employers can already offer fertility benefits under existing excepted-benefit rules. Since February 2026, TrumpRx.gov has offered discounted cash prices on three fertility drugs. A May 2026 proposed rule would create a new limited-excepted-benefit category for voluntary employer fertility coverage, with a $120,000 lifetime cap. That rule is only proposed and is not yet in effect.
The rating is compromise because the President has backed concrete, partial steps toward cheaper IVF, and some of them are in effect: the drug discounts and the guidance on existing employer benefit options. They are a much narrower version of the pledge. None of these actions creates a nationwide government-paid IVF benefit, coverage stays optional for employers and insurers, and the drug discounts could reduce the cost of a $15,000-to-$25,000 fertility-treatment cycle by about 10%, according to an American Society for Reproductive Medicine spokesperson quoted by KFF Health News. Broken was the closest alternative, since the White House has stepped back from the two ways Trump said he would pay for IVF. It was not chosen because the administration did not act against the goal of IVF access, and there was no missed deadline. It made a real and continuing effort, just a narrower one than he promised.
“Compromise” means: part of the promise happened, part did not.
How editors decide a ratingWhat “Compromise” meansReport an error in this rating
The evidence
Votes, bills, laws and statements related to this promise, newest first.
Showing 5 of 5 items
- Supports
Executive action
Proposed rule on voluntary employer fertility benefits
Labor, HHS and Treasury proposed a new category of limited excepted benefits for fertility care, including IVF, that employers may offer, with a $120,000 lifetime cap. Coverage would be optional for employers. The rule is only proposed: it would apply from 2027 if finalized, and it had not been finalized or taken effect as of October 2026.
- Supports
Executive action
TrumpRx.gov launches with discounted fertility drugs
TrumpRx.gov launched with lower cash prices for Gonal-F, Cetrotide and Ovidrel. Most TrumpRx prices are only for people paying cash without insurance. The discounts could reduce the cost of a $15,000-to-$25,000 fertility-treatment cycle by about 10%, according to an American Society for Reproductive Medicine spokesperson quoted by KFF Health News.
- Supports
Executive action
Fertility drug deal and guidance on existing employer options
The White House announced a most-favored-nation pricing deal with EMD Serono on fertility drugs, to be sold through TrumpRx.gov. Labor, HHS and Treasury issued FAQs explaining how employers can offer fertility benefits under existing excepted-benefit rules, and said they intended to propose rules adding new ways to offer them. Employers are not required to offer the benefits, and these actions do not create a nationwide government-paid IVF benefit.
- Contradicts
Statement
White House reported to have no plans for an IVF coverage mandate
White House officials told The Washington Post they had no current plans to require insurance coverage of IVF. They said they could not mandate coverage without Congress, and no bill was planned. CBS News had reported days earlier that the executive order's 90-day deadline for recommendations had passed and the White House declined to comment on them.
- Supports
Executive action
Executive Order 14216 on expanding access to IVF
Trump ordered the Domestic Policy Council to send him recommendations within 90 days on protecting IVF access and cutting out-of-pocket and health plan costs. The order did not itself require coverage or provide funding. When it was signed, federal IVF coverage was limited: the VA covers IVF for veterans who cannot conceive because of a service-connected condition, and for plan year 2025 all FEHB plans covered up to three cycles of IVF drugs while 25 FEHB plans covered IVF services and procedures.
Cite this rating
See something wrong?
Send us a source we missed or a fact we got wrong. Every correction is published in the corrections log.
Report an error