Bycatch Reduction Act

This Act may be cited as the “Bycatch Reduction Act”.

(a) In general.— The North Pacific Fishery Management Council shall—

(1) establish a pelagic trawl gear performance standard for vessels using pelagic trawl gear in fisheries managed under the Bering Sea and Aleutian Islands Groundfish Fishery Management Plan and Gulf of Alaska Groundfish Fishery Management Plan (referred to in this section as “applicable vessels”); and

(2) implement enforceable regulations to manage gear impacts from such applicable vessels on benthic habitat and reduce unobserved mortality on important subsistence, commercial, or recreational species during fishing operations.

(b) Establish a pelagic trawl gear baseline.—

(1) In general.— Not later than 1 year after the date of enactment of this Act, the North Pacific Fishery Management Council shall use methods, such as gear design standards, model and field testing verification, sensors, or technology, to identify the current baseline of the effects of pelagic trawl gear on marine benthic habitat in areas managed under the Bering Sea and Aleutian Islands Groundfish Fishery Management Plan and Gulf of Alaska Groundfish Fishery Management Plan.

(2) Independent review.— The North Pacific Fishery Management Council shall enter into an agreement with the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine to review the methodology, data, and findings used to identify the baseline under paragraph (1). The results of the review shall be made publicly available.

(c) Regulations.— Following the identification of the pelagic trawl gear baseline under subsection (b), the Administrator of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (referred to in this Act as the “Administrator”), in consultation with the North Pacific Fishery Management Council, shall promulgate regulations to reduce impacts relative to such baseline from pelagic trawl gear, including through—

(1) requiring gear modifications to pelagic trawl gear, including requiring applicable vessels to be equipped with a commercially available seafloor contact detection system capable of monitoring and verifying the net position and clearance of pelagic trawl gear in relation to the seafloor;

(2) reductions in the amount of fishing effort that results in pelagic trawl gear making contact with the marine benthic habitat in areas that are closed to nonpelagic trawl gear;

(3) prohibitions on fishing by pelagic trawl gear in areas closed to nonpelagic trawl gear; or

(4) prohibitions in fishing by pelagic trawl gear if there are any areas identified in section 6(c)(4) that support juvenile recruitment of important subsistence, commercial, or recreational species.

(d) Monitoring; data retention and access.— In providing consultation to the Administrator for the promulgation of regulations under subsection (c)(1), the North Pacific Fishery Management Council shall consider—

(1) establishing protocols for the collection, storage, and submission of data related to the use of pelagic trawl gear;

(2) requiring real-time or near-real-time monitoring of such data, with transmission of such data each week to support compliance monitoring and enforcement;

(3) ensuring seafloor contact detection systems are compatible with existing electronic monitoring or observer programs implemented by the National Marine Fisheries Service; and

(4) establishing requirements for the retention, submission, and confidentiality of data collected under this section consistent with section 402 of the Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management Act (16 U.S.C. 1881a).

(e) Enforcement.— An applicable vessel that fails to comply with the regulations promulgated under this section shall be deemed to have violated the Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management Act (16 U.S.C. 1801 et seq.) and shall be subject to the penalties and sanctions, including civil penalties, permit sanctions, or other enforcement actions, provided under such Act.

(f) Consultation.— In implementing this section, the Administrator and the North Pacific Fishery Management Council shall consult with affected subsistence, commercial, and recreational participants, including harvesters, processors, communities, and community development quota groups.

(a) In general.—

(1) Gear performance standards.— The North Pacific Fishery Management Council shall establish a gear performance standard system for applicable vessels using nonpelagic trawl gear in fisheries managed under the Bering Sea and Aleutian Islands Groundfish Fishery Management Plan and Gulf of Alaska Groundfish Fishery Management Plan to manage gear impacts on benthic habitat and reduce unobserved mortality on important subsistence, commercial, or recreational species during fishing operations.

(2) Applicable vessel.— In this section, the term applicable vessel means a trawl catcher/processor vessel that is not eligible to harvest pollock under section 208 of the American Fisheries Act (16 U.S.C. 1851 note).

(b) Performance review and standards.— Not later than 1 year after the date of enactment of this Act, the Administrator shall—

(1) deliver a report to the North Pacific Fishery Management Council that—

(A) identifies, using methods such as gear design standards, model and field testing verification, sensors, or technology, the current baseline of the effects of nonpelagic trawl gear on marine benthic habitat in areas managed under the Bering Sea and Aleutian Islands Groundfish Fishery Management Plan and Gulf of Alaska Groundfish Fishery Management Plan; and

(B) describes nonpelagic trawl gear regulations for applicable vessels and analyzes the potential impacts to marine benthic habitat and bycatch from modifying nonpelagic trawl gear; and

(2) establish a 1-year phase in period that requires each applicable vessel to be equipped with a modified footrope and modified trawl sweeps, as applicable, to reduce seafloor contact and maximize seafloor clearance relative to such baseline from applicable vessels using nonpelagic trawl gear.

(c) Independent review.— The Administrator shall enter into an agreement with the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine to review the methodology, data, and findings used to identify the baseline under subsection (b)(1)(A). The results of the review shall be made publicly available.

(d) Full compliance.— The Administrator shall require full compliance with the requirements of this section not later than 2 years after the date of enactment of this Act.

(e) Enforcement.— An applicable vessel that fails to comply with the requirements of this section or regulations issued under this section shall be deemed to have violated the Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management Act (16 U.S.C. 1801 et seq.) and shall be subject to the penalties and sanctions, including civil penalties, permit sanctions, or other enforcement actions, provided under such Act.

(f) Consultation.— In implementing this section, the Administrator and the North Pacific Fishery Management Council shall consult with affected subsistence, commercial, and recreational participants, including harvesters, processors, communities, and community development quota groups.

(a) Regional fishery management councils.— Section 302 of the Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management Act (16 U.S.C. 1852) is amended—

(1) in subsection (e), by striking paragraph (5) and inserting the following:

“(5) Each Council shall hold a recorded vote on all non-procedural matters before the Council. The official minutes and other appropriate records of any Council meeting shall identify all roll call votes held, the name of each voting member present during each roll call vote, and how each member voted on each roll call vote.”;

(2) in subsection (i)(2), by adding at the end the following:

“(G) Each Council shall make available on the internet website of the Council—

(i) to the extent practicable, a webcast, an audio recording, or a live broadcast of each meeting of the Council, and of the Council coordination committee established under subsection (l), that is not closed in accordance with paragraph (3); and

(ii) audio, video (if the meeting was in person or by video conference), or a searchable audio or written transcript of each meeting of the Council and of the meetings of advisory bodies of the Council, by not later than 30 days after the conclusion of the meeting.

(H) The Secretary shall maintain and make available to the public a permanent online archive of each webcast, audio, broadcast, video, and transcript made available under clauses (i) and (ii) of subparagraph (G).”;

(3) in subsection (j)—

(A) in paragraph (1), by striking subparagraph (B) and inserting the following:

“(B) the term designated official means an attorney employed in the Office of the General Counsel of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration who—

(i) has expertise in Federal conflict-of-interest requirements; and

(ii) is designated by the Secretary, in consultation with a Council, to attend the meetings of such Council and make determinations under paragraph (7)(B).”;

(B) in paragraph (2)(C), by inserting “contractor,” after “partner,”; and

(C) in paragraph (5)(B), by striking “on the Internet” and inserting “on the internet website of National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, on the internet website of the applicable Council,”.

(b) North pacific fishery management council written public comment procedure.— Not later than 180 days after the date of enactment of this Act, the North Pacific Fishery Management Council shall update its Public Comment Policy and provide a minimum comment period of 4 weeks before the start of the Council meeting.

(c) National oceanic and atmospheric administration recusal review process.—

(1) In general.— Not later than 1 year after the date of enactment of this Act, the Administrator shall conduct a comprehensive review of the financial interest and recusal procedures under section 302(j) of the Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management Act (16 U.S.C. 1852(j)) and the regulations promulgated to carry out such section, including section 600.235 of title 50, Code of Federal Regulations (or successor regulations).

(2) Compliance.— The review under paragraph (1) shall evaluate whether there has been compliance with regulatory requirements promulgated to carry out section 302(j) of the Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management Act (16 U.S.C. 1852(j)), including timely submission of disclosures and the effectiveness and consistency of recusal determinations.

(3) Identification of gaps and weaknesses.— The Administrator shall include, as part of the annual report to be submitted in 2027, in accordance with section 302(j)(9) of the Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management Act (16 U.S.C. 1852(j)(9)), a section identifying any gaps or weaknesses in the current disclosure and recusal process and providing recommendations on defining or clarifying the recusal standards.

(a) In general.— The North Pacific Fishery Management Council shall require all vessels using pelagic trawl gear in fisheries managed under the Bering Sea and Aleutian Islands Groundfish Fishery Management Plan and Gulf of Alaska Groundfish Fishery Management Plan (referred to in this section as “applicable vessels”) to be equipped with a salmon excluder device.

(b) Gear requirements.— Not later than 1 year after the date of enactment of this Act, the North Pacific Fishery Management Council shall require each applicable vessel to be equipped with a salmon excluder device that is operational and has been field tested, scientifically reviewed, and verified to reduce salmon bycatch effectively.

(c) Salmon excluder devices.— The Administrator shall—

(1) support field testing and scientific review of salmon excluder devices; and

(2) implement an outreach strategy to ensure industry adoption.

(d) Technical assistance and guidance.— The Administrator shall provide technical assistance and guidance to applicable vessel operators to facilitate installation and use of approved salmon excluder devices.

(e) Full compliance.— The Administrator shall require full compliance with the requirements of this section not later than 1 year after the date of enactment of this Act.

(f) Enforcement.— An applicable vessel that fails to comply with the requirements of this section or regulations issued under this section shall be deemed to have violated the Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management Act (16 U.S.C. 1801 et seq.) and shall be subject to the penalties and sanctions, including civil penalties, permit sanctions, or other enforcement actions, provided under such Act.

(g) Consultation.— In developing regulations to implement this section, the Administrator and the North Pacific Fishery Management Council shall consult with affected fishing industry participants, including harvesters, processors, communities, and community development quota groups.

(a) Reconstitution of the alaska salmon research task force.—

(1) In general.— The Administrator shall reconstitute the membership of the Alaska Salmon Research Task Force, as described in the Alaska Salmon Research Task Force Act (Public Law 117–328; 136 Stat. 5271).

(2) Bycatch reduction task force.— The reconstituted membership described in paragraph (1) shall be referred to as the “Bycatch Reduction Task Force”.

(3) Members.— The Secretary of Commerce shall appoint an additional 7 representatives to the Bycatch Reduction Task Force as follows:

(A) 3 members who are academic experts, of which 1 member shall be an expert in salmon ecology, 1 member shall be an expert in groundfish ecology, and 1 member shall be an expert in invertebrate ecology.

(B) 1 member who is a resident of the Bering Sea or Aleutian Islands region and 1 member who is a resident of the Gulf of Alaska region.

(C) 2 members who are subject matter experts with trawl fishing gear technology and its operations.

(4) Duties.— The Bycatch Reduction Task Force shall—

(A) review all research conducted and reports published under this section; and

(B) in consultation with the Administrator, provide priority recommendations for future work as described in subsection (d)(2).

(5) Inapplicability of federal advisory committee act.— Chapter 10 of title 5, United States Code (commonly known as the “Federal Advisory Committee Act”), shall not apply to the Bycatch Reduction Task Force. Notwithstanding the inapplicability of chapter 10 of title 5, United States Code, the Administrator shall, to the maximum extent practicable and consistent with protection of confidential and proprietary information, make publicly available on an internet website—

(A) the membership of the Bycatch Reduction Task Force;

(B) meeting dates and agendas of the Bycatch Reduction Task Force;

(C) non-proprietary materials provided to or produced by the Bycatch Reduction Task Force; and

(D) a mechanism for the public to submit written statements for consideration by the Bycatch Reduction Task Force.

(b) Salmon life history research.—

(1) Salmon tagging.—

(A) In general.— The Administrator shall enter into public-private partnerships with State agencies, nonprofit organizations, institutions of higher education (as defined in section 101(a) of the Higher Education Act of 1965 (20 U.S.C. 1001(a))), Indian Tribes or Tribal organizations (as defined in section 4 of the Indian Self-Determination and Education Assistance Act (25 U.S.C. 5304)), and research institutions to research the marine life history of Alaska origin salmon species in the Bering Sea, Aleutian Islands, and Gulf of Alaska.

(B) Partnerships.— In entering into partnerships described in subparagraph (A), the Administrator—

(i) shall involve a diverse group of Alaska salmon experts, including Alaska Natives, fishing industry representatives, commercial fishermen, and individuals who possess personal knowledge of, and direct experience with, subsistence uses in Alaska; and

(ii) may include cooperative research efforts with privately owned commercial or charter fishing vessel owners.

(C) Research.—

(i) In general.— At a minimum, the research required under subparagraph (A) shall include satellite tagging or other intelligent tagging methodologies to better understand migration and distributions of Alaska origin salmon during their marine life history in the Bering Sea, Aleutian Islands, or Gulf of Alaska.

(ii) Satellite tagging studies.— The satellite tagging or other intelligent tagging described in clause (i) shall aim to conduct—

(I) genetic determination of stock-of-origin on all tagged salmon;

(II) an analysis of movement, behavior, and habitat use for different genetic stocks;

(III) systematic sampling across different ages, sizes, run timings, and cohorts rather than opportunistic tagging; and

(IV) research on depth occupancy patterns, vertical migration behavior, and 3-dimensional habitat associations.

(iii) Data stewardship and analyses.—

(I) In general.— The Administrator shall ensure the results and analyses under this subsection are publicly accessible, usable, and directly applicable to better understanding Alaska origin salmon migrations and distributions, and to reduce bycatch in the Bering Sea, Aleutian Islands, and Gulf of Alaska.

(II) Methods.— In carrying out all analyses under this subsection, the Administrator, in consultation with the Bycatch Reduction Task Force and applicable public-private partnerships described under subparagraph (A), shall use modern analytical methods that may include machine learning or artificial intelligence for predictive modeling, to the extent practicable.

(III) Public availability.— All—

(aa) methods and models used to carry out this subsection shall be publicly available and accessible for use in peer-reviewed venues or technical reports and shall include all algorithms and analytical code; and

(bb) developed or produced tools, guides, visualizations, or decision-support products used to carry out this subsection shall be made publicly available and usable.

(IV) Open standards.— All satellite tagging data collected under this subsection shall abide by open data standards and be deposited in publicly accessible repositories (such as the Ocean Tracking Network or the Animal Telemetry Network) using standardized formats.

(D) Inapplicability of federal advisory committee act.— Chapter 10 of title 5, United States Code (commonly known as the “Federal Advisory Committee Act”), shall not apply to the partnerships described in subparagraph (A).

(2) Genetic sampling grant program.— The Administrator shall conduct a competitive grant program to support improving the turnaround time of genetic analyses of biological samples collected at-sea or shoreside to provide real-time or near-real-time, in-season genetic stock identification, and age composition estimates of Alaska origin salmon caught incidentally in commercial fisheries conducted in the exclusive economic zone (as defined in section 3 of the Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management Act (16 U.S.C. 1802) off Alaska).

(3) Reporting.— Not later than 3 years after the date of enactment of this Act, the Administrator shall publish a report—

(A) on the findings of the salmon tagging research conducted under paragraph (1) and the findings of the genetic analyses grant program conducted under paragraph (2) that details how the salmon tagging research and genetic analyses can better inform Alaska origin salmon stock status and distributions; and

(B) that includes potential uses of artificial intelligence or machine learning technology to perform predictive modeling to inform potential Alaska salmon bycatch avoidance areas.

(c) Ecosystem analyses.—

(1) In general.— The Administrator shall conduct—

(A) research, through studies and models that incorporate existing data, literature, and ongoing research, including relevant international data and research from comparable marine ecosystems, of how contact from nonpelagic trawl and pelagic trawl gear impact shallow shelves or other marine benthic habitats in the Bering Sea, Aleutian Islands, and Gulf of Alaska;

(B) a review of existing data, literature, and ongoing research efforts on fluctuations in Bering Sea, Aleutian Islands, and Gulf of Alaska marine ecosystems that may affect the survivability or energetic condition of commercially or culturally important wild marine and anadromous species, including examining—

(i) harmful algal blooms;

(ii) marine heatwaves;

(iii) in-river temperatures;

(iv) sea ice extent and thickness;

(v) ocean acidification;

(vi) diseases;

(vii) nutrient or prey availability;

(viii) density dependence;

(ix) shifting stock distributions;

(x) carrying capacity;

(xi) impacts from hatchery released species, with particular attention to foreign hatchery releases; and

(xii) predator-prey interactions; and

(C) new research, using the review of data, literature, and ongoing research efforts under subparagraph (B), to prioritize data collection that support conservation of commercially or culturally important wild marine and anadromous species.

(2) Diverse group involvement.— In conducting research under paragraph (1), the Administrator shall—

(A) enter into public-private partnerships with relevant entities, such as State agencies, nonprofit organizations, institutions of higher education (as defined in section 101(a) of the Higher Education Act of 1965 (20 U.S.C. 1001(a))), and Indian Tribes or Tribal organizations (as defined in section 4 of the Indian Self-Determination and Education Assistance Act (25 U.S.C. 5304)); and

(B) involve a diverse group of experts in commercially or culturally important wild marine and anadromous species, including Alaska Natives, fishing industry representatives, commercial fishermen, and individuals who possess personal knowledge of, and direct experience with, subsistence uses in Alaska.

(3) Data stewardship and analyses.—

(A) In general.— The Administrator shall ensure the results and literature review analyses under this subsection are publicly accessible, usable, and directly applicable to the research conducted under this subsection.

(B) Methods.— In carrying out all analyses under this subsection, the Administrator, in consultation with the Bycatch Reduction Task Force and applicable public-private partnerships described under subparagraph (2) shall use modern analytical methods that may include machine learning or artificial intelligence for predictive modeling, to the extent practicable.

(C) Public availability.— All—

(i) methods and models used to carry out this subsection shall be publicly available and accessible for use in peer-reviewed venues or technical reports and shall include all algorithms and analytical code; and

(ii) developed or produced tools, guides, visualizations, or decision-support products used to carry out this subsection shall be made publicly available and usable.

(D) Open standards.— All newly produced ecosystem data collected under this subsection shall abide by open data standards and be deposited in publicly accessible repositories using standardized formats.

(4) Juvenile recruitment of species.— As part of the essential fish habitat (EFH) review, the North Pacific Fishery Management Council shall analyze areas closed to 1 or more commercial fishing gear types that overlap with habitats that support juvenile recruitment of important commercial, subsistence, or recreational species. The review shall include an evaluation of the potential benefits associated with such closures, and whether these habitat closure areas should be expanded to other commercial fishing gear types.

(d) Reports.—

(1) In general.— The Administrator shall publish interim annual reports and a final report (not later than 3 years after the date of enactment of this Act)—

(A) on findings and results of the research and literature review analyses conducted under subsection (c)(1) and the status of milestones reached for all research initiatives under this section;

(B) on the results from the salmon tagging and genetic sampling research under subsection (b), including modeled Alaska origin salmon migration routes and potential applications to inform how best to minimize Alaska salmon bycatch; and

(C) that includes results from the ecosystem analyses under subsection (c).

(2) Recommendations; findings.— The reports described under paragraph (1) shall include—

(A) descriptions of explicit mechanisms to connect research outputs to management processes through research products that document specific examples of how research findings are being incorporated into management decisions, fishery regulations, or industry practices;

(B) recommendations to the North Pacific Fishery Management Council on creating feedback loops that ensure collaboration through establishing regular workshops or working groups that bring together researchers, managers, industry representatives, and fishermen to coordinate research efforts and share findings related to bycatch reduction;

(C) recommendations for applying the results from the ecosystem analyses review to model potential impacts on commercially or culturally important wild marine and anadromous species in the Bering Sea, Aleutian Islands, and Gulf of Alaska to support informed management actions; and

(D) other findings and recommendations for future work under this section.

(a) Definitions.— In this section:

(1) Beneficial owner.— The term beneficial owner means, with respect to a vessel, a person that directly or indirectly, through any contract, arrangement, understanding, relationship, or otherwise—

(A) exercises substantial control over the vessel; or

(B) owns not less than 50 percent of the ownership interests of the vessel.

(2) Foreign vessel.— The term foreign vessel has the meaning given the term in section 110 of title 46, United States Code.

(3) Seafood.— The term seafood means fish, shellfish, or other aquatic animal life intended for human consumption, whether fresh, frozen, canned, smoked, prepared, or otherwise processed.

(b) Prohibition.— It is prohibited for any person in the United States to enter into or facilitate, directly or indirectly, any transaction related to the importation, procurement, or selling of seafood from a foreign vessel or beneficial owner of a foreign vessel unless the Secretary of Commerce determines that the fishery from which the seafood originates harvests fish in a way that is comparable to the national standards for fishery conservation and management under the Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management Act (16 U.S.C. 1801 et seq.).

(c) Seizure.— Any seafood in the possession of a person that violates the prohibition described in subsection (b) shall be seized by the Secretary of Commerce.

(d) Disposal of seafood.— The Secretary of Commerce shall determine how to dispose of any seafood seized under subsection (c).

(a) In general.— The Administrator shall enter into a public-private partnership to build a flume tank for the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, the fishing industry, and other researchers to test technology and improved fishing gear aimed at reducing bycatch and contact with Bering Sea, Aleutian Islands, and Gulf of Alaska marine benthic habitats.

(b) Flume tank assistance fund.— The Administrator shall establish a Flume Tank Assistance Fund to provide grants or other financial assistance to support entities that wish to test their innovative technology, including approaches that support prototype development and associated devices, instruments, sensors, or fishing gear designs aimed at reducing bycatch in fisheries and contact with Bering Sea, Aleutian Islands, and Gulf of Alaska marine benthic habitat from mobile or fixed fishing gear, including workforce and training programs on such technology or gear.

(a) Electronic monitoring and reporting.— The Administrator shall—

(1) create a timeline and process for reviewing and approving exempted fishing permits in Federally managed North Pacific fisheries to support innovative fishing gear types and technology for reducing bycatch, unobserved fishing mortality, and reducing marine habitat disturbances, including streamlining exempted fishing permits for fishermen and owners and operators of commercial fishing vessels who purchase or modify fishing gear, equipment, or technology with financial assistance provided under the Bycatch Mitigation and Habitat Protection Assistance Fund, established under section 322 of the Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management Act, if approving such permits does not interfere with fishery conservation objectives;

(2) streamline the approval process for experimental or exempted fishing permits used in Federally managed North Pacific fisheries for electronic monitoring pilot projects, including owners and operators of commercial fishing vessels who purchase or utilize low-cost commercially available electronic monitoring solutions, if approving such permits does not interfere with fishery conservation objectives;

(3) facilitate cooperative research programs and regional pilot frameworks;

(4) conduct a public stakeholder consultation process not less often than once every 3 years, which shall include public notice, listening sessions, a written comment period of not less than 60 days, and solicit input from stakeholders, including service providers, regional fishery management councils, fishery industry participants, and data scientists, on—

(A) revisions to electronic monitoring and electronic reporting technical standards or operational guidance;

(B) improvements to cost-effectiveness or usability; and

(C) barriers to electronic monitoring adoption, particularly among small-scale fleets; and

(5) provide a data integration strategy that—

(A) incorporates electronic monitoring data directly into regional science center workflows and stock assessment models;

(B) reduces latency between data collection and management application; and

(C) supports the development of interoperable databases that facilitate real-time or near-real-time analysis and decision-making.

(b) Transparency.— The Administrator shall—

(1) require the regional offices of the National Marine Fisheries Service to publish, online and in layman’s terms, up-to-date observer coverage category requirements for Federal trawl fisheries specifying the Federal fishery under their jurisdiction, including prohibited species catch (bycatch) for each observer program category; and

(2) ensure that the National Marine Fisheries Service develops and disseminates, in print and for online distribution, public communications materials that clearly explain bycatch in Federal fisheries under its jurisdiction, using accessible, layman’s terminology and graphics.

(c) Reporting.—

(1) In general.— Not later than 3 years after the date of enactment of this Act, the Administrator shall publish a report on how the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration and Regional Fishery Management Councils can improve and integrate the use of observer and electronic monitoring data to better inform spatio-temporal fishing activity and impacts to harvested and incidentally harvested populations, while ensuring the protection of confidential information.

(2) Report to congress.— The Administrator shall submit a report to Congress and publish the report on the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration’s website that includes the data integration strategy for increasing data review efficiency and uniformity described in subsection (a)(5). The report shall include a summary of the feedback received during public stakeholder consultation described in subsection (a)(4).

(3) Recommendations.— The reports required under paragraphs (1) and (2) shall include recommendations—

(A) for the use of any technologies identified as effective for sharing real-time, or near-real-time, catch information to identify bycatch hotspots and bycatch avoidance areas; and

(B) to minimize bycatch and unobserved fishing mortality of commercially or culturally important wild marine and anadromous species in the Bering Sea, Aleutian Islands, and Gulf of Alaska, such as Pacific halibut, Alaska crab species, and Alaska-origin salmon.

(a) Reauthorization of the NOAA national marine fisheries service bycatch reduction engineering program.— Section 316 of the Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management Act (16 U.S.C. 1865) is amended—

(1) by redesignating subsections (a), (b), (c), and (d), as subsections (b), (c), (d), and (e), respectively;

(2) by inserting before subsection (b), as so redesignated, the following:

“(a) Purpose.— The purpose of the bycatch reduction program established under subsection (b) is to develop technological devices and other conservation engineering changes to improve fishing practices and minimize bycatch, seabird interactions, bycatch mortality, unobserved fishing mortality, and post-release mortality in Federally managed fisheries.”; and

(3) by adding at the end the following:

“(f) Authorization of appropriations.— There is authorized to be appropriated to the Secretary to carry out this section $10,000,000 for each of fiscal years 2027 through 2031.”.

(b) Bycatch mitigation and habitat protection assistance fund.— Title III of the Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management Act (16 U.S.C. 1851 et seq.) is amended by adding at the end the following:

“322. Bycatch mitigation and habitat protection assistance fund.—

(a) In general.— There is established in the general fund of the Treasury of the United States an account to be known as the “Bycatch Mitigation and Habitat Protection Assistance Fund”, which shall—

(1) be administered by the Foundation; and

(2) consist of donations of amounts accepted pursuant to subsection (c).

(b) Use.— The Foundation shall use the amounts in the Fund to reduce or mitigate bycatch, and reduce marine benthic habitat contact from mobile or fixed fishing gear, including by providing financial assistance to fishing industry organizations, associations, fishermen and owners and operators of commercial fishing vessels to purchase or modify fishing gear, equipment, and technology, including innovative technology, prototypes, instruments, or sensors.

(c) Donations.— The Foundation may solicit and accept donations of amounts for deposit into the Fund.

(d) Consultation.— In administering the Fund, the Foundation shall consult with the Secretary, acting through the Administrator of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, each Council, and each of the regional offices and science centers of the National Marine Fisheries Service to ensure that, to the maximum extent practicable, amounts in the Fund are used in an efficient and cost-effective manner.

(e) Report.— Not later than 3 years after the date of enactment of this section, and biennially thereafter, the Foundation shall publish and post online in a manner available to the public information regarding the use of the Fund during—

(1) with respect to the first publication of information, the preceding 3 years; and

(2) with respect to each subsequent publication of information, the preceding 2 years.

(f) Definitions.— In this section:

(1) Foundation.— The term Foundation means the National Fish and Wildlife Foundation.

(2) Fund.— The term Fund means the Bycatch Mitigation and Habitat Protection Assistance Fund established under subsection (a).”.